ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "วิกิพีเดีย:สภากาแฟ/อภิปราย/Movement Strategy 2019"

เนื้อหาที่ลบ เนื้อหาที่เพิ่ม
Taweetham (คุย | ส่วนร่วม)
ไม่มีความย่อการแก้ไข
Taweetham (คุย | ส่วนร่วม)
บรรทัด 14:
 
;1. Advocacy การรวมกลุ่มจัดตั้ง
* What needs to happen so that people are inspired to do advocacy?
*?
* What are the barriers to advocacy in your particular context?
*?
* How can we ensure that the movement's advocacy efforts are not harming the neutrality of the Wikimedia project's content?
*?
 
;2. Capacity building การสร้างศักยภาพ
* What capacity building efforts already exist within any part of the Movement?
* ?
* Which ones have worked and which ones have not?
* ?
* What are the capacity building needs of movement stakeholders and their organizations?
* ?
 
;3. Community Health สุขภาวะของชุมชน
* Participation: Are there practices, policies and regulations within your community or project that create barriers to involvement in the light of the strategic direction’s challenge to us all?
* ?
* Group culture and tools: What prevents good faith contributors and functionaries from taking effective action against bad behaviour? What rules and tools do you lack in trying to address the current situation and which challenges your community faces on the journey towards the 2030 direction?
* ?
* Structures, processes, regulations: Who, in your opinion, is ultimately responsible for the wellbeing of contributors in your community or project, and for taking actions against bad behaviour endangering a community?
* ?
 
 
;4. Diversity ความหลากหลาย
* Safety-- Are there safe space and whistleblower policies and decision-making processes, both on and off Wikimedia platforms, that need to change to ensure diverse representation and foster a “safe environment” for authentic voices to share
* ?
their knowledge without being drowned out by mainstream bias -- both direct and systemic --or made to feel excluded or disrespected?
* ?
* Documentation-- Recognizing that legal and social barriers have undervalued people and activities of diverse segments of society, can our open knowledge movement bridge gaps and eliminate barriers in expanding equal opportunities for inclusion and representation by bringing content on line for which scholarship either does not exist or is emerging, accepting a broader definition of reliability and neutrality in sources?
* ?
* Technology--Can technological support and systems be designed which help bridge gaps and give voice to more diverse segments of society so that geographical location, socio-economic status, access to technology and formalized academic study do not become barriers to inclusion?
 
;5. Partnerships ความร่วมมือ
* In your opinion, what kinds of partnerships are the most important to fulfilling the goals of the Movement Strategy?
* ?
* With whom should we be partnering and why?
* ?
* What can we learn from other organisations or movements who have faced, or are facing, similar challenges? Who should we be studying / talking to?
* ?
* What kinds of partnerships have you established in the past or currently? Can you point us to such cases, highlighting strengths and weaknesses, challenges and opportunities
 
;6. Product & Technology ผลิตภัณฑ์และเทคโนโลยี