ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "รอยซ์"

In the years that followed, other states subscribed to limitations of their conduct, and numerous other treaties and bodies were created to regulate the conduct of states towards one another in terms of these treaties, including, but not limited to, the [[Permanent Court of Arbitration]] in 1899; the [[Hague Conventions (1899 and 1907)|Hague]] and [[Geneva Conventions]], the first of which was passed in 1907; the [[International Court of Justice]] in 1921; the [[Genocide Convention]]; and the [[International Criminal Court]], in the late 1990s. Because international law is a relatively new area of law its development and propriety in applicable areas are often subject to dispute.

 

{{See also|Monism and dualism in international law}}

The conflict between international law and national sovereignty is subject to vigorous debate and dispute in academia, diplomacy, and politics. Certainly, there is a growing trend toward judging a state's domestic actions in the light of international law and standards. Numerous people now view the nation-state as the primary unit of international affairs, and believe that only states may choose to voluntarily enter into commitments under international law, and that they have the right to follow their own counsel when it comes to interpretation of their commitments. Certain scholars and political leaders feel that these modern developments endanger nation states by taking power away from state governments and ceding it to international bodies such as the U.N. and the World Bank, argue that international law has evolved to a point where it exists separately from the mere consent of states, and discern a legislative and judicial process to international law that parallels such processes within domestic law. This especially occurs when states violate or deviate from the expected standards of conduct adhered to by all civilized nations.